Terry v. Goord

272 A.D.2d 701, 708 N.Y.S.2d 909
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 272 A.D.2d 701 (Terry v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. Goord, 272 A.D.2d 701, 708 N.Y.S.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

After submitting a urine sample which tested positive for the presence of opiates, petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged with using a controlled substance. Following a tier III hearing, he was found guilty of the charge. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report and positive test results, together with the testimony presented at the hearing, provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Aviles v Selsky, 264 AD2d 883). We also reject petitioner’s claim that the urinalysis sample was not handled properly. The evidence sufficiently demonstrated that the drug testing was performed in accordance with applicable procedures and that the chain of custody was adequately established (see, 7 NYCRR 1020.4 [e]; Matter of Selby v Coombe, 249 AD2d 597). Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, Graffeo, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Herring v. Goord
300 A.D.2d 724 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Forestier v. Goord
289 A.D.2d 859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
McMillan v. Goord
289 A.D.2d 757 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Wilson v. Selsky
287 A.D.2d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Castaldo v. Goord
283 A.D.2d 838 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Marks v. Goord
281 A.D.2d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Cintron v. Goord
280 A.D.2d 794 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Robertson v. Selsky
279 A.D.2d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Kae v. Selsky
279 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Jude v. Goord
277 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Myers v. Goord
274 A.D.2d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 A.D.2d 701, 708 N.Y.S.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.