Terry v. Farmers Supply Co.

119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 93, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 742
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 12, 1923
Docket14381
StatusPublished

This text of 119 S.E. 459 (Terry v. Farmers Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. Farmers Supply Co., 119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 93, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.,

The only grounds of the motion for new trial being that the verdict against the defendant is unauthorized by any evidence, because the account sued upon was not that of the defendant but that of another, and the verdict being fully supported by evidence tending to show that the liability was that of the defendant, under credit extended upon his express authority, this court cannot interfere with the action of the trial judge denying the motion for new trial. Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875).

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edge v. Thomas
71 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 93, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-farmers-supply-co-gactapp-1923.