Terry v. Farmers Supply Co.
119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 93, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 742
Opinion
The only grounds of the motion for new trial being that the verdict against the defendant is unauthorized by any evidence, because the account sued upon was not that of the defendant but that of another, and the verdict being fully supported by evidence tending to show that the liability was that of the defendant, under credit extended upon his express authority, this court cannot interfere with the action of the trial judge denying the motion for new trial. Edge v. Thomas, 9 Ga. App. 559 (71 S. E. 875).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terry v. Farmers Supply Co., 119 S.E. 459, 31 Ga. App. 93, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 742 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
119 S.E. 459 (Terry v. Farmers Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edge v. Thomas
71 S.E. 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)