Terry v. Coker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Terry v. Coker

1914 OK 65, 138 P. 814, 41 Okla. 427, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 155

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 10, 1914

Docket3625

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1914 OK 65 (Terry v. Coker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terry v. Coker, 1914 OK 65, 138 P. 814, 41 Okla. 427, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 155 (Okla. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

*428 Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 23, 1912. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200, and cases cited.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*428 Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error and transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court February 23, 1912. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the cause, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi). The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 Pac. 543; Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 Pac. 200, and cases cited.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK 65, 138 P. 814, 41 Okla. 427, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-coker-okla-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack