Terry v. Clothier

25 P. 673, 1 Wash. 475, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 100
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 19, 1890
DocketNo. 117
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 25 P. 673 (Terry v. Clothier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry v. Clothier, 25 P. 673, 1 Wash. 475, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 100 (Wash. 1890).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Durbar, J.

It appears from the complaint in this case that the plaintiffs were not parties interested in the estate. No one else has a right to object to a confirmation of sale. This being true, the complaint did not state facts to constitute a cause of action, and the demurrer was properly sustained. Other questions were raised in the case, but as the judgment of this court sustaining the demurrer on this point disposes of the case, it is not necessary to enter into their discussion.

The judgment of the court below is affirmed, with costs.

ÁNDers, 0. J., and Hoyt, Stiles and Scott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latimer v. Mechling
301 S.E.2d 819 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1983)
McClellan v. Jackson
301 P.2d 172 (Washington Supreme Court, 1956)
In Re Scholes'estate
301 P.2d 172 (Washington Supreme Court, 1956)
In Re Estate of Van Der Werf
53 N.W.2d 238 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1952)
Pulliam v. Pulliam
10 F. 53 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 P. 673, 1 Wash. 475, 1890 Wash. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-v-clothier-wash-1890.