Terry v. Broadhurst

Supreme Court of Georgia

Terry v. Broadhurst

56 S.E. 282, 127 Ga. 212, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 806

DecidedDecember 20, 1906

StatusPublished

This text of 56 S.E. 282 (Terry v. Broadhurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terry v. Broadhurst, 56 S.E. 282, 127 Ga. 212, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 806 (Ga. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where it appeared that the subscribing witness to a. written instrument was attending school in another State at the time of the trial, his absence was sufficiently accounted for, and the execution of the instrument could be proved otherwise than by his testimony. Civil Code,. § 5245; Harris v. Cannon, 6 Ga. 382, 389.

2. The evidence supported the verdict, and.there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI