Terry v. Broadhurst

56 S.E. 282, 127 Ga. 212, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 806
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 20, 1906·Published

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

1. Where it appeared that the subscribing witness to a. written instrument was attending school in another State at the time of the trial, his absence was sufficiently accounted for, and the execution of the instrument could be proved otherwise than by his testimony. Civil Code,. § 5245; Harris v. Cannon, 6 Ga. 382, 389.

2. The evidence supported the verdict, and.there was no error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry v. Broadhurst, 56 S.E. 282, 127 Ga. 212, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 806 (Ga. 1906).

56 S.E. 282 (Terry v. Broadhurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Cannon
6 Ga. 382 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1849)