Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. Griffian

109 S.E. 174, 27 Ga. App. 396, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 924
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 6, 1921
Docket12080
StatusPublished

This text of 109 S.E. 174 (Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. Griffian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Shipbuilding Corp. v. Griffian, 109 S.E. 174, 27 Ga. App. 396, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 924 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The petition in this ease sets out a cause of action, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. The demurrer was on the grounds: (1) No cause of action is set out. (2) The allegations of paragraph 6, as to the manner in which the forge was upset, are too vague and indefinite. (3) It is not shown what caused the forge to become upset and fall on the plaintiff. (4) There are no facts alleged that show that negligence of the defendant was the proximate cause of the injury. Hitch & Denmark, David S. Atkinson, for plaintiff in error,

cited: 140 Ga. 459-60; 21 Ga. App. 412; 25 Ga. App. 794; 21 Ga. App. 379 (1), and cit.; 146 Ga. 300; Civil Code (1910), § 4509; 103 Ga. 847-9; 12 Ga. App. 286, 290; 6 Ga. App. 30G; 17 Ga. App. 707; 22 Ga. App. 557; 23 Ga. App. 753; 114 Ga. 390; 131 Ga. 791 (2); 115 Ga. 1009.

Gignilliat & O’Neal, J. S. Harrison, Thomas F. Walsh Jr., contra,

cited: 87 Ga. 692; 29 Cyc. 630 (III); 116 Ga. 152; 80 Ga. 114; 108 Ga. 805; 62 Ga. 685; 105 Ga. 135; 118 Ga. 651; 92 Ga. 727; 2 Ga. App. 79.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coggin v. Central Railroad
62 Ga. 685 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1879)
Cheeves v. Danielly
4 S.E. 902 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Mayor of Macon v. Dykes
31 S.E. 443 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1898)
Andrews & Co. v. Kinsel
40 S.E. 300 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Miller v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
42 S.E. 385 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Southern Railway Co. v. Webb
59 L.R.A. 109 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Jackson v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
45 S.E. 254 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Barnwell
63 S.E. 501 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)
Thomas v. Georgia Granite Co.
79 S.E. 130 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Byrd v. Thompson
91 S.E. 100 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Cedartown Cotton & Export Co. v. Miles
58 S.E. 289 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Southern Railway Co. v. Barber
77 S.E. 172 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)
City of Albany v. Brown
88 S.E. 215 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Dunn
94 S.E. 661 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Anthony v. Dudley Sash, Door & Lumber Co.
94 S.E. 634 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Higginbotham v. Rome Railway & Light Co.
99 S.E. 638 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Gray v. Hines
104 S.E. 925 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 S.E. 174, 27 Ga. App. 396, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-shipbuilding-corp-v-griffian-gactapp-1921.