Terry Ray Mathews v. State
This text of Terry Ray Mathews v. State (Terry Ray Mathews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00081-CR ____________________
TERRY RAY MATHEWS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________
On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 94-01-00028 CR ________________________________________________________ _____________
ORDER
On February 11, 2013, Terry Ray Mathews filed a notice of appeal from a
judgment nunc pro tunc signed by the trial court on January 11, 2013. On February
27, 2013, Mathews filed a request for appointed counsel with this Court. Matters
concerning the appointment of counsel should be addressed by the trial court in the
first instance. See generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(a) (West Supp.
2012).
1 It is, therefore, ORDERED that the case is remanded to the trial court for a
hearing to determine whether the appellant is indigent. If appellant is indigent and
requests that counsel be appointed, the trial court shall determine whether appellant
has a right to appointed counsel to represent the appellant for the appeal unless the
appellant elects to proceed pro se, in which case the trial court shall determine
whether appellant’s decision is knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v.
California, 422 U.S. 836, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.E.2d 562 (1975); East v. State, 48
S.W.3d 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). The supplemental
clerk’s record containing any orders and findings made by the trial court and a
reporter’s record of any hearings conducted pursuant to this Order shall be filed
with the Court of Appeals by April 8, 2013. The appeal is abated and all appellate
timetables are suspended while the case is in the trial court.
ORDER ENTERED March 7, 2013.
PER CURIAM
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terry Ray Mathews v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-ray-mathews-v-state-texapp-2013.