Terry Ray Mathews v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 2013
Docket09-13-00081-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Terry Ray Mathews v. State (Terry Ray Mathews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Ray Mathews v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00081-CR ____________________

TERRY RAY MATHEWS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 94-01-00028 CR ________________________________________________________ _____________

ORDER

On February 11, 2013, Terry Ray Mathews filed a notice of appeal from a

judgment nunc pro tunc signed by the trial court on January 11, 2013. On February

27, 2013, Mathews filed a request for appointed counsel with this Court. Matters

concerning the appointment of counsel should be addressed by the trial court in the

first instance. See generally Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04(a) (West Supp.

2012).

1 It is, therefore, ORDERED that the case is remanded to the trial court for a

hearing to determine whether the appellant is indigent. If appellant is indigent and

requests that counsel be appointed, the trial court shall determine whether appellant

has a right to appointed counsel to represent the appellant for the appeal unless the

appellant elects to proceed pro se, in which case the trial court shall determine

whether appellant’s decision is knowingly and intelligently made. See Faretta v.

California, 422 U.S. 836, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.E.2d 562 (1975); East v. State, 48

S.W.3d 412 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.). The supplemental

clerk’s record containing any orders and findings made by the trial court and a

reporter’s record of any hearings conducted pursuant to this Order shall be filed

with the Court of Appeals by April 8, 2013. The appeal is abated and all appellate

timetables are suspended while the case is in the trial court.

ORDER ENTERED March 7, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
East v. State
48 S.W.3d 412 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Terry Ray Mathews v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-ray-mathews-v-state-texapp-2013.