Terry Lewis Campbell v. Edward W. Murray, Director M. A. Tidwell Ellis Wright Powhatan Reception & Classification Center Medical Staff

25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20784, 1994 WL 202440
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 24, 1994
Docket94-6252
StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1038 (Terry Lewis Campbell v. Edward W. Murray, Director M. A. Tidwell Ellis Wright Powhatan Reception & Classification Center Medical Staff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Lewis Campbell v. Edward W. Murray, Director M. A. Tidwell Ellis Wright Powhatan Reception & Classification Center Medical Staff, 25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20784, 1994 WL 202440 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

25 F.3d 1038
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Terry Lewis CAMPBELL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Director; M. A. Tidwell; Ellis Wright;
Powhatan Reception & Classification Center Medical
Staff, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6252.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 21, 1994.
Decided: May 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-93-182-AM)

Terry Lewis Campbell, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Murray, No. CA-93-182-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20784, 1994 WL 202440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-lewis-campbell-v-edward-w-murray-director-m--ca4-1994.