Terry Lee Morris v. State
This text of Terry Lee Morris v. State (Terry Lee Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________
No. 02-19-00399-CR ___________________________
TERRY LEE MORRIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1614716R
Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Terry Lee Morris filed a pro se notice of appeal, acknowledging that
his guilty plea was “entered pursuant to the provisions of Article 1.15 of the Code of
Criminal Pro[c]edure[] and that the punishment assessed does not . . . exceed that
recommended by the Prosecutor and agreed to by the Defendant” but argues that his
plea was “obtained by coercion of counsel.” The trial court certification states that
this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). The trial court’s judgment, which sets forth the terms of the
plea, supports the certification.
We informed Appellant of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this
appeal based on the trial court’s certification. We gave Appellant the opportunity to
file a response, which he did, but it does not show grounds for continuing this
appeal.1
Accordingly, because the trial court’s certification indicates that Appellant has
no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d),
43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); see also Cooper v.
State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 82 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (holding that right of appeal in plea-
bargained cases set forth in Article 44.02 of the Code of Criminal Procedure excludes
complaint that plea was involuntary).
In his response, Appellant requests that this court appoint counsel to assist 1
him with filing his brief. We deny the request as moot.
2 Per Curiam
Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
Delivered: February 13, 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terry Lee Morris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-lee-morris-v-state-texapp-2020.