Terry Lamar Britton v. RSS Recovery Solutions Services

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 24, 2023
Docket01-23-00259-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Terry Lamar Britton v. RSS Recovery Solutions Services (Terry Lamar Britton v. RSS Recovery Solutions Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Lamar Britton v. RSS Recovery Solutions Services, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Opinion issued August 24, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00259-CV ——————————— TERRY LAMAR BRITTON, Appellant V. RSS RECOVERY SOLUTIONS SERVICES, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1187123

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Terry Lamar Britton filed his notice of appeal on April 5, 2023.

Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of

appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. The Clerk of this Court notified

Appellant that unless he paid the appellate filing fee by May 26, 2023, his appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, Appellant has not paid

the appellate filing fee.

The clerk’s record also has not been filed. Appellant has neither established

indigence for purposes of court costs nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee

for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We

notified Appellant that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the

clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3 (a), (b). We directed Appellant

to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by June 26, 2023, reflecting he

paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To date,

Appellant has not responded to this Court’ notice and the clerk’s record has not been

filed.

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b)-(c). We deny any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas-Molloy, and Guerra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Terry Lamar Britton v. RSS Recovery Solutions Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-lamar-britton-v-rss-recovery-solutions-services-texapp-2023.