Terry James v. Richard LeMay

378 F. App'x 455
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2010·No. 10-10282·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons given by the magistrate judge and district judge.

Federal courts are limited in their jurisdiction. Defamation or injury to reputation is not a protected liberty interest to justify federal jurisdiction. Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976). And Mr. James has not complained of a conspiracy to harm him because of his race.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terry James v. Richard LeMay, 378 F. App'x 455 (5th Cir. 2010).

378 F. App'x 455 (Terry James v. Richard LeMay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. Lemay
178 L. Ed. 2d 173 (Supreme Court, 2010)