Terry Donnell Watson v. Warden

Eleventh Circuit

Terry Donnell Watson v. Warden

504 F. App'x 830

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 2013

Docket12-11592

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 504 F. App'x 830 (Terry Donnell Watson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terry Donnell Watson v. Warden, 504 F. App'x 830 (11th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terry Watson, an inmate at the Child-ersburg Community Work Center in Alabama, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the current procedures and practices for inmate drug testing conducted by the Alabama Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and the implementation of DOC Administrative Regulation #440 (“AR 440”). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the injunction. For background, see Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 589, 94 S.Ct. 2968, 2982-83, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). The public’s interest in the administration of a safe prison system, free of drugs, is great. Besides, Watson failed to show that he would suffer an imminent, irreparable injury (one not compensable through monetary damages) in the absence of a preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Terry Watson, an inmate at the Child-ersburg Community Work Center in Alabama, appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his request for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the current procedures and practices for inmate drug testing conducted by the Alabama Department of Corrections (“DOC”) and the implementation of DOC Administrative Regulation #440 (“AR 440”). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the injunction. For background, see Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 589, 94 S.Ct. 2968, 2982-83, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974). The public’s interest in the administration of a safe prison system, free of drugs, is great. Besides, Watson failed to show that he would suffer an imminent, irreparable injury (one not compensable through monetary damages) in the absence of a preliminary injunction.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

504 F. App'x 830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-donnell-watson-v-warden-ca11-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack