Terry Dale Carnes v. State
This text of Terry Dale Carnes v. State (Terry Dale Carnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-11-00686-CR _____________________
TERRY DALE CARNES, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
_________________________________________________________________ _
On Appeal from the 359th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 11-10-10957 CR _________________________________________________________________ _
ORDER
The brief of the appellant was originally due on August 13, 2012. The Court
granted a final extension, which expired on October 12, 2012. On November 29,
2012, we abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for the purpose
of determining why the brief of the appellant has not been filed and to determine
whether there is good cause for appellate counsel to be removed and replaced with
substitute counsel. In a hearing conducted on December 20, 2012, the trial court
1 found that the appellant, Terry Dale Carnes, desires to appeal and that substituting
counsel would further delay the appeal. At the hearing, counsel admitted that he
had not completed the brief, notwithstanding the expiration of his final extension,
but he claimed that he “should be able to get that completed” by February 1, 2013.
The trial court asked counsel if it were reasonable to expect the brief to be filed by
February 8, 2013, and counsel replied that it would.
The trial court shall conduct a hearing within thirty days of the date of this
order. If at the hearing counsel fails to prove that he has prepared and filed with
the Court of Appeals a brief together with a motion for leave to allow late filing of
the brief, the trial court shall consider whether there is cause to remove appointed
counsel and replace him with new counsel. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art.
26.04(j)(2) (West Supp. 2012). The trial court shall prepare written findings and
recommendations. A supplemental clerk’s record, containing any orders and
findings of the trial court, together with a supplemental reporter’s record of the
hearing here ordered, shall be filed on or before March 28, 2013.
ORDER ENTERED February 14, 2013.
PER CURIAM
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Kreger, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terry Dale Carnes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-dale-carnes-v-state-texapp-2013.