Terry Casey v. Grant County Sheriff Dept.

307 F. App'x 26
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 2009
Docket07-3288
StatusUnpublished

This text of 307 F. App'x 26 (Terry Casey v. Grant County Sheriff Dept.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terry Casey v. Grant County Sheriff Dept., 307 F. App'x 26 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Terry Casey challenges the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co., 507 F.3d 1149, 1152 (8th Cir.2007) (standard of review), we conclude that Casey’s claims regarding the traffic stop are either barred by collateral estoppel, see Crumley v. City of St. Paul, Minn., 324 F.3d 1003, 1006-07 (8th Cir.2003); O’Marra v. Mackool, 361 Ark. 32, 204 S.W.3d 49, 53 (2005), or fail on *27 their merits as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47 B.

1

. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'MARRA v. MacKool
204 S.W.3d 49 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co.
507 F.3d 1149 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
307 F. App'x 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-casey-v-grant-county-sheriff-dept-ca8-2009.