Terry C. Trentacosta v. State
This text of Terry C. Trentacosta v. State (Terry C. Trentacosta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-13-00287-CR
Terry C. TRENTACOSTA, Appellant
v. The State The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2006CR6469 Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Luz Elena Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: February 19, 2014
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
Appellant Terry C. Trentacosta appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for
forensic DNA testing under chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. Appellant’s
court-appointed attorney has filed a brief in which he concludes this appeal is frivolous and without
merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1978). Counsel has also filed a motion to withdraw. Counsel represents that appellant was
provided with a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw, and was informed of his right to file 04-13-00287-CR
his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no
pet.). Appellant did not file his own brief.
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. We agree that this appeal is frivolous
and without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed, and the motion to withdraw is
granted. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 85-86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.);
Bruns, 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1.
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of
this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition
for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for
discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the later of (1) the date of this opinion;
or (2) the date the last timely motion for rehearing is overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P.
68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review should comply with the
requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4.
Karen Angelini, Justice
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terry C. Trentacosta v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terry-c-trentacosta-v-state-texapp-2014.