Terron v. Kupec
This text of Terron v. Kupec (Terron v. Kupec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6535
TIMMY TERRON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; JOSEPH COLBURN, Captain; R. T. WELLS, Sergeant; L. R. VANN, Captain; EDWIN TURNER, Principal; VICTOR ELBECK, Adj. H.O.; ROBERT D. RITCHEY; MARVIN N. ROBBINS, I.G.O.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-01- 2155-AMD)
Submitted: October 2, 2002 Decided: October 16, 2002
Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timmy Terron, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Timmy Terron seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying reconsideration of the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Terron v. Kupec, No. CA-01-2155-AMD (D. Md.
July 30, 2001 & Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terron v. Kupec, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terron-v-kupec-ca4-2002.