Terron v. Kupec

Fourth Circuit

Terron v. Kupec

48 F. App'x 79

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2002·No. No. 02-6535·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Timmy Terrón seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration of the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Terrón v. Kwpec, No. CA-01-2155-AMD (D. Md. July 30, 2001 & Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Timmy Terrón seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying reconsideration of the denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Terrón v. Kwpec, No. CA-01-2155-AMD (D. Md. July 30, 2001 & Jan. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Terron v. Kupec, 48 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

48 F. App'x 79 (Terron v. Kupec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related