Territory v. Tunnell

4 Mont. 148
CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Mont. 148 (Territory v. Tunnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Territory v. Tunnell, 4 Mont. 148 (Mo. 1881).

Opinion

Galbraith, J.

The principal question in this case is essentially the same as that presented in the case of The Territory v. Edmonson, decided at this term.

We might also notice an additional error assigned by the appellant, viz., that the judge, in charging the jury, incorrectly stated in his instructions that the defendant admitted the shooting and killing of the deceased, as charged in the indictment, when, as the record shows, the defendant’s admission was that “'the shot he fired killed Jones, at the time and place alleged in the indictment.” This statement was evidently misleading in its character, and prejudicial to the defendant.

For this reason, and also for the reason assigned in the case of Territory v. Edmonson, above mentioned, we are of the opinion that the judgment in this case should be reversed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment herein appealed from be reversed, and the case remanded for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Peel
59 P. 169 (Montana Supreme Court, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Mont. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/territory-v-tunnell-mont-1881.