Territory v. Meyer

Hawaii Supreme Court

Territory v. Meyer

37 Haw. 251, 1945 Haw. LEXIS 6

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 1945·No. Nos. 2551, 2555.·Published

Opinion

Appellant's petitions for rehearing do not rest upon grounds warranting a second consideration of appellant's briefs nor do the petitions state any matters that were not considered by this court in rendering its opinion or any, if reconsidered, that would change the result thereof. *Page 252

Argument upon then is not desired by any concurring justice.

The petitions, being without merit, are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant's petitions for rehearing do not rest upon grounds warranting a second consideration of appellant's briefs nor do the petitions state any matters that were not considered by this court in rendering its opinion or any, if reconsidered, that would change the result thereof. *Page 252

Argument upon then is not desired by any concurring justice.

The petitions, being without merit, are denied.

Territory v. Meyer, 37 Haw. 251, 1945 Haw. LEXIS 6 (haw 1945).

Pincite

37 Haw. 251 (Territory v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.