Territory v. Lucas

19 Haw. 162
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided July 17, 1908·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

Defendant, having been convicted of violating Section 1068. of the Revised Laws, brings up a bill of exceptions in which the [163]*163only question raised is the right of a deputy county attorney to appear for the Territory in a criminal case.

C. R. Hemenway, Attorney General, for the Territory. Carl S. Smith for defendant.

We find no merit in the exceptions.

Section 90 of the County Act, S. L. 1905, Act 39, provides that the county attorney or his deputy shall “attend the circuit court in and for said county and conduct on behalf of the people all prosecutions therein for offenses against the laws of the Territory of Hawaii.” Defendant contends that it is uncertain whether the “people” referred to mean the people of the Territory or of the county, bat that in any event the Territory is not meant. This court, however, in County of Oahu v. Whitney, 17 Haw. 174, 187, has already construed the phrase “on behalf of the people” to mean “on behalf of the Territory.”

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Territory v. Lucas, 19 Haw. 162 (haw 1908).

19 Haw. 162 (Territory v. Lucas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ruggles v. Yagong
323 P.3d 155 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2014)
Marsland v. First Hawaiian Bank
764 P.2d 1228 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1988)