Territory v. Lee

17 P. 884, 3 Wash. Terr. 396, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 7
CourtWashington Territory
DecidedJanuary 25, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 P. 884 (Territory v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Territory v. Lee, 17 P. 884, 3 Wash. Terr. 396, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 7 (Wash. Super. Ct. 1888).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendants were indicted for keeping a [397]*397house in which persons inhaled opium. A jury was called to try the case; and after being duly impaneled and sworn, a.n objection was made by defendants to the admission of any evidence, because of the insufficiency of the indictment. The objection was sustained, and the jury, under instruction, found and returned a verdict of not guilty, and judgment was rendered thereon. The territory excepted, and brings the case here by writ of error. It is claimed that section 1140 of the Code allows the territory a review of this trial. It is clearly not within the statute, and the writ must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wright
111 P. 18 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 P. 884, 3 Wash. Terr. 396, 1888 Wash. Terr. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/territory-v-lee-washterr-1888.