Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company

Supreme Court

Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company

201 U.S. 41, 26 S. Ct. 386, 50 L. Ed. 651, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1814

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedMarch 12, 1906

Docket182

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 U.S. 41 (Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Company, 201 U.S. 41, 26 S. Ct. 386, 50 L. Ed. 651, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1814 (1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chiep Justice Fuller

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Territory of New Mexico commenced three separate actions against appellees, respectively, in the District Court of Grant County, New Mexico, to recover taxes alleged to be due on a levy to pay certain judgments against the county, including *42 a particular item of $276.21, arising from the increase of the valuation of the property of the railroad companies. The. aggregate amount claimed ivas $8,646.49 with interest at the rate of twenty-five per cent per annum.- The cases were consolidated and submitted to the District Court on an agreed statement of facts with exhibits attached, a jury being waived, and resulted in a judgment, October 9, 1902, for $5,156:71, with interest at six-per cent per annum. This included the $276.21 with interest. Appellees sued out writs of error from the Supreme Court-of the Territory. No cross writ of error was brought'-and no cross errors were assigned. In the Supreme Court the item of $276.21 with interest was not contested.' February 26, 1903, the Supreme Court announced its conclusion that the judgment be reversed, but as the item of $276.21 was not contested, rendered judgment for that amount, thereby .rejecting the sum of $4,880.50 of the judgment below, that sum . with interest at six per cent amounting to less than five thousand dollars on that date. 72 Pac. Rep. 14. From the judgment so rendered the Territory prosecuted an appeal to .this court, under the act of Congress in that behalf, January 17, 1905, and prayed in its assignment of errors that the judgment of the Supreme Court be .reversed and set aside, and the cause be “ remanded to said Supreme Court, with directions to affirm the judgment of the T)istrict Court of Grant County. ” The appeal was heard in this court on January 26, 1906, and on that day appellant filed an additional assignment of errors to the effect that the Supreme Court of New Mexico erred in failing to hold that appellant was entitled to interest at the rate of twenty-five per cent per annum from October 9,1902. But the judgment of the District Court gave interest at six per cent, and, as before stated, the Territory did not complain of that judgment as rendered.

By the act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat. 443; c. 355, no appeal or writ-of error could be allowed from any judgment or decree of the Territorial Supreme Courts, witli certain exceptions not material here, “unless the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, *43 stall exceed the sum of five thousand dollars. ” The matter in dispute here was that part of the judgment of the District Court which was disallowed by the Supreme Court and that was less than five thousand dollars.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chiep Justice Fuller

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Territory of New Mexico commenced three separate actions against appellees, respectively, in the District Court of Grant County, New Mexico, to recover taxes alleged to be due on a levy to pay certain judgments against the county, including *42 a particular item of $276.21, arising from the increase of the valuation of the property of the railroad companies. The. aggregate amount claimed ivas $8,646.49 with interest at the rate of twenty-five per cent per annum.- The cases were consolidated and submitted to the District Court on an agreed statement of facts with exhibits attached, a jury being waived, and resulted in a judgment, October 9, 1902, for $5,156:71, with interest at six-per cent per annum. This included the $276.21 with interest. Appellees sued out writs of error from the Supreme Court-of the Territory. No cross writ of error was brought'-and no cross errors were assigned. In the Supreme Court the item of $276.21 with interest was not contested.' February 26, 1903, the Supreme Court announced its conclusion that the judgment be reversed, but as the item of $276.21 was not contested, rendered judgment for that amount, thereby .rejecting the sum of $4,880.50 of the judgment below, that sum . with interest at six per cent amounting to less than five thousand dollars on that date. 72 Pac. Rep. 14. From the judgment so rendered the Territory prosecuted an appeal to .this court, under the act of Congress in that behalf, January 17, 1905, and prayed in its assignment of errors that the judgment of the Supreme Court be .reversed and set aside, and the cause be “ remanded to said Supreme Court, with directions to affirm the judgment of the T)istrict Court of Grant County. ” The appeal was heard in this court on January 26, 1906, and on that day appellant filed an additional assignment of errors to the effect that the Supreme Court of New Mexico erred in failing to hold that appellant was entitled to interest at the rate of twenty-five per cent per annum from October 9,1902. But the judgment of the District Court gave interest at six per cent, and, as before stated, the Territory did not complain of that judgment as rendered.

By the act of March 3, 1885, 23 Stat. 443; c. 355, no appeal or writ-of error could be allowed from any judgment or decree of the Territorial Supreme Courts, witli certain exceptions not material here, “unless the matter in dispute, exclusive of costs, *43 stall exceed the sum of five thousand dollars. ” The matter in dispute here was that part of the judgment of the District Court which was disallowed by the Supreme Court and that was less than five thousand dollars.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 U.S. 41, 26 S. Ct. 386, 50 L. Ed. 651, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/territory-of-new-mexico-v-atchison-topeka-santa-fe-railway-company-scotus-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack