Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca

46 Haw. 126
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 12, 1962·No. No. 4156·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for rehearing sets forth matters which have already been fully considered by the court. The “projected” Mendonca Estate lots were utilized under the evidence merely to determine the nature and extent of the benefit of access to the remaining lands of the Mendonca Estate as an entity and not as subdivided lots.

Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied without argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca, 46 Haw. 126 (haw 1962).

46 Haw. 126 (Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Acierno v. State Ex Rel. Secretary of the Department of Transportation
643 A.2d 1328 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1994)