Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca
46 Haw. 126
Opinion
The petition for rehearing sets forth matters which have already been fully considered by the court. The “projected” Mendonca Estate lots were utilized under the evidence merely to determine the nature and extent of the benefit of access to the remaining lands of the Mendonca Estate as an entity and not as subdivided lots.
Accordingly, the petition for rehearing is denied without argument.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca, 46 Haw. 126 (haw 1962).
46 Haw. 126 (Territory of Hawaii v. Mendonca) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Acierno v. State Ex Rel. Secretary of the Department of Transportation
643 A.2d 1328 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1994)