Territory of Hawaii v. Lanier
40 Haw. 278
Opinion
The defendant himself moves for a rehearing of the cause decided by this court in 40 Hawaii 65. The grounds of petitioner, however, are argumentative in character and repetitive of matters heretofore fully briefed and argued by counsel at the hearing on appeal and thereafter fully considered by this court. Upon again reviewing the record, this court finds no basis for a rehearing.
The petition is denied without argument under the rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Territory of Hawaii v. Lanier, 40 Haw. 278 (haw 1953).
40 Haw. 278 (Territory of Hawaii v. Lanier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Balucan
353 P.2d 631 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960)
Re Habeas Corpus, Balucan
353 P.2d 631 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1960)