Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong
6 Dakota 226
This text of 6 Dakota 226 (Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Territory of Dakota v. Armstrong, 6 Dakota 226 (dakotasup 1889).
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed, the court being of opinion, 1. That quo warrmito is a proper remedy.
2. That the action is properly brought under our statute in the name of the district attorney.
[231]*2313. That the action is properly brought against the defendants without joinder of the alleged corporation.
4. That the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Attorney General v. City of Methuen
236 Mass. 564 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
State v. Evans
160 P. 140 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Tallmadge v. Walker
159 N.W. 71 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
State ex rel. Mort v. Tralstead
156 N.W. 75 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1916)
Wm. N. Coler & Co. v. Dwight School Township
55 N.W. 587 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1893)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Dakota 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/territory-of-dakota-v-armstrong-dakotasup-1889.