Terrill v. State
This text of 695 So. 2d 915 (Terrill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rejecting the appellant’s primary point on appeal from his first degree murder conviction, we find no error in the trial court’s exclusion of proffered “expert” testimony that the crime occurred while he was “subject to a homosexual rage, which explains the form of the killing and how he carried the killing out and why it happened under those circumstances.” Lee v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., — So.2d - [1997 WL 332912] (Fla. Case no. 87,071, opinion filed, June 19, 1997) [22 FLW S354]; Hadden v. State, 690 So.2d 573 (Fla.1997); see State v. Bias, 653 So.2d 380 (Fla.1995). There is no other error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 915, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7179, 1997 WL 345988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrill-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.