Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District

Ohio Supreme Court

Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 23, 1960

DocketNo. 36306

StatusPublished

This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 (Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrett v. Court of Appeals of the Seventh Appellate District, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition fails to state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be a substitute for appeal.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied.

Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taut, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition fails to state operative facts which show that relator has no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. A writ of prohibition will ordinarily not be allowed where there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law and may not be a substitute for appeal.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and the writ of prohibition is denied.

Demurrer sustained and writ denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taut, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrett-v-court-of-appeals-of-the-seventh-appellate-district-ohio-1960.