Terrence Vann v. Terry Russell, Defendant/Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Terrence Vann v. Terry Russell, Defendant/Respondent.

DecidedSeptember 2, 2014

DocketED101838

StatusPublished

This text of Terrence Vann v. Terry Russell, Defendant/Respondent. (Terrence Vann v. Terry Russell, Defendant/Respondent.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrence Vann v. Terry Russell, Defendant/Respondent., (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE TERRENCE VANN, ) No. ED101838 Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) vs. ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Francois County TERRY RUSSELL, ) Defendant/Respondent. ) Filed: September 2, 2014

Appellant appeals from the judgment denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The State has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant has not filed a response. We

dismiss the appeal.

Appellant filed a petition for habeas corpus with the trial court, which denied his petition.

Appellant filed an appeal from this judgment and has raised two points in his brief assigning

error to the denial of his habeas petition. However, the denial of a petition for writ of habeas

corpus is not appealable. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, 97 S.W.3d 458,

458 (Mo. banc 2003); Webster v. Purkett, 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003).

The State’s motion to dismiss is granted. The appeal is dismissed for lack of an

appealable judgment.

__________________________________ ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, CHIEF JUDGE

LISA VAN AMBURG, J. and PHILIP M. HESS, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI