Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State

DecidedSeptember 16, 2009

Docket12-09-00284-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State (Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-09-00284-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TERRENCE BERNARD WOODARD, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, and the trial court assessed punishment at imprisonment for twenty years. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right of appeal. The certification further shows that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered September 16, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-09-00284-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TERRENCE BERNARD WOODARD, § APPEAL FROM THE 241ST APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery, and the trial court assessed punishment at imprisonment for twenty years. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that this is a plea bargain case and Appellant has no right of appeal. The certification further shows that Appellant waived his right to appeal. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant and his counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Opinion delivered September 16, 2009. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Terrence Bernard Woodard v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrence-bernard-woodard-v-state-texapp-2009.