Terrence Benoit v. Iberia Parish Police Dept., et

569 F. App'x 215
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 23, 2014
Docket13-30965
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 569 F. App'x 215 (Terrence Benoit v. Iberia Parish Police Dept., et) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terrence Benoit v. Iberia Parish Police Dept., et, 569 F. App'x 215 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Terrence Knight Benoit, Louisiana prisoner # 489486, appeals the district court’s *216 dismissal for failure to state a claim of his pro se, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, civil rights complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). Benoit moves for appointment of appellate counsel. However, he is not proceeding in forma pauperis, and he has made no attempt to show that he is indigent. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Accordingly, his motion is denied.

In his complaint, Benoit alleged that he had been illegally arrested and was illegally confined and that after his arrest there was an illegal search and seizure. The district court agreed with the magistrate judge’s determination that the complaint failed to state a claim because the relief Benoit sought—immediate release—could not be obtained via § 1983.

Although Benoit reasserts in his appellate brief the claims he raised below, he does not address the district court’s reason for dismissing the complaint. Thus, he has abandoned any challenge to the district court’s dismissal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Benoit raises for the first time on appeal numerous issues that he did not raise in the district court. We decline to address these issues. See Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto Glass Discount Centers, Inc., 200 F.3d 307, 316-17 (5th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be *216 published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 F. App'x 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrence-benoit-v-iberia-parish-police-dept-et-ca5-2014.