Terrell v. Vaughn

Michigan Supreme Court

Terrell v. Vaughn

759 N.W.2d 398

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 27, 2009

Docket137175

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 759 N.W.2d 398 (Terrell v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrell v. Vaughn, 759 N.W.2d 398 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

759 N.W.2d 398 (2009)

Justin TERRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clarissa Marie-Marion VAUGHN, Willie McClain, d/b/a Pride Asphalt Paving and Concrete, and Mirac, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 137175. COA No. 283511.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

By order of September 12, 2008, this Court granted immediate consideration and a stay of enforcement of the judgments entered by the Kent Circuit Court on September 13, 2007 and August 29, 2008. On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of trial court proceedings, ordered on September 12, 2008, is DISSOLVED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

759 N.W.2d 398 (2009)

Justin TERRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clarissa Marie-Marion VAUGHN, Willie McClain, d/b/a Pride Asphalt Paving and Concrete, and Mirac, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 137175. COA No. 283511.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 27, 2009.

Order

By order of September 12, 2008, this Court granted immediate consideration and a stay of enforcement of the judgments entered by the Kent Circuit Court on September 13, 2007 and August 29, 2008. On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 18, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The stay of trial court proceedings, ordered on September 12, 2008, is DISSOLVED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

759 N.W.2d 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-v-vaughn-mich-2009.

Opinion

Justin TERRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Clarissa Marie-Marion VAUGHN, Willie McClain, d/b/a Pride Asphalt Paving and Concrete, and Mirac, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Defendants-Appellants.

Order

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Justin TERRELL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Clarissa Marie-Marion VAUGHN, Willie McClain, d/b/a Pride Asphalt Paving and Concrete, and Mirac, Inc. d/b/a Enterprise Rent-A-Car, Defendants-Appellants.