Terrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Terrell v. State

1911 OK CR 20, 113 P. 223, 5 Okla. Crim. 12, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 44

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 6, 1911

DocketNo. 348.

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1911 OK CR 20 (Terrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrell v. State, 1911 OK CR 20, 113 P. 223, 5 Okla. Crim. 12, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 44 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

Judgment in this case was pronounced on the 15th day of July, 1909, and the defendants were granted by the court. 40 days within which to- prepare and serve a case-made, which time expired on the 24th day of August, 1909. On the 28th day of August, 1909, the defendants served their case-made upon the county attorney of Carter county. As this case-made was served after the expiration of the time pre *13 scribed by the trial court, we cannot consider the ease-made, and it must be stricken from the record. See Durant v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 447, 106 Pac. 651.

The information in this case is in due form. There are no material errors in the instructions of the court, and the judgment is in strict conformity with the law. The conviction of the appellants is therefore affirmed, with directions to the county court of Carter county to proceed with the execution of the judgment

ABMSTBONG and. DOYLE, Judges, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

Judgment in this case was pronounced on the 15th day of July, 1909, and the defendants were granted by the court. 40 days within which to- prepare and serve a case-made, which time expired on the 24th day of August, 1909. On the 28th day of August, 1909, the defendants served their case-made upon the county attorney of Carter county. As this case-made was served after the expiration of the time pre *13 scribed by the trial court, we cannot consider the ease-made, and it must be stricken from the record. See Durant v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 447, 106 Pac. 651.

The information in this case is in due form. There are no material errors in the instructions of the court, and the judgment is in strict conformity with the law. The conviction of the appellants is therefore affirmed, with directions to the county court of Carter county to proceed with the execution of the judgment

ABMSTBONG and. DOYLE, Judges, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1911 OK CR 20, 113 P. 223, 5 Okla. Crim. 12, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 44, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-v-state-oklacrimapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack