Terrell v. State

745 S.W.2d 135, 294 Ark. 583, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 367
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 22, 1988·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Ricky Terrell, by his attorney, M. Watson Villines II, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late in that it contains no written indication that within thirty days from the filing of a motion for new trial, a ruling was obtained from the trial court either that the motion was being taken under advisement or that the matter was set for hearing on a definite date. Ark. R. App. P. 4(c); Smith v. Boone, 284 Ark. 183, 680 S.W.2d 709 (1984).

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terrell v. State, 745 S.W.2d 135, 294 Ark. 583, 1988 Ark. LEXIS 367 (Ark. 1988).

745 S.W.2d 135 (Terrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuller v. State
872 S.W.2d 54 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)
Enos v. State
858 S.W.2d 72 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1993)