Terrell v. Logan
This text of 10 N.C. 319 (Terrell v. Logan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Miller is not a party to the proceedings now before the Court, and no decree, for that reason, can be made against him. We cannot, therefore, undertake to vacate the grant complained of, which the . state made to him.
The act of 1793, which gives this court jurisdiction in regard to grants, does not give it jurisdiction with regard to mesne conveyances from one man to another. Therefore we have no power to disturb the conveyances made to Logan, and to those under whom he claims. Whatever title he may have by possession, under colour of those mesne conveyances, we must leave him in thq undisturbed possession of. I agree in opinion with the judge in the Superior Court, that the petition must bf dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 N.C. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-v-logan-nc-1824.