Terrell v. Bennet
This text of 18 Ga. 404 (Terrell v. Bennet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[406]*406 By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
It would be a useless and vain thing to undertake to go over, seriatim, the various specifications set forth in the record. We state the general proposition to be this : that in an action at law for deceit, in falsely representing a third person fit to be trusted, the scienter is material, and must be alleged and proved. The word fraudulently has been hold to be, a sufficient substitute for the other allegation. (1. Chitty's Pl. 388, and note. Willes' R. 584.)
This is the tost, then, by which the instructions submitted by the Court to the Jury, and those which were withhold, are to be tried. Fraud is the gist of the proceeding. The representation must not only be false, but it - must originate in a fraudulent motive, either to injure the party who is thereby circumvented, or to benefit the one who makes the representation. And whenever this is done, and the deception is practiced successfully, whereby damages result, a right of action accrues.
We affirm the judgment of the Court below in granting the new trial, leaving it for the parties to determine, for themselves, whether they will litigate further upon the special facts of the case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ga. 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-v-bennet-ga-1855.