Terrell Gooden v. Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of 73 F.3d 357 (Terrell Gooden v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terrell GOODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-6906.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.
Terrell Gooden, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gooden v. Virginia, No. CA-95-544-R (W.D.Va. June 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 357, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-gooden-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-ca4-1996.