Terrell Albert Bishop v. Department of corrections/director
This text of Terrell Albert Bishop v. Department of corrections/director (Terrell Albert Bishop v. Department of corrections/director) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 1, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice
Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack 154693 & (25) David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Kurtis T. Wilder Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices TERRELL ALBERT BISHOP, Plaintiff-Appellant, v SC: 154693 COA: 333757 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 1, 2018 s0423 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terrell Albert Bishop v. Department of corrections/director, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrell-albert-bishop-v-department-of-correctionsdirector-mich-2018.