Terrel v. Townsend
6 Tex. 149
Opinion
It is unnecessary to enter upon the inquiry as to what acts or omissions of the holder of negotiable paper will operate to discharge a surety upon it, as it is evident that the pleas in tiffs case do not allege any act or omission which could have that effect. They state no facts which constituted in law a defeuse to the action. There is therefore no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terrel v. Townsend, 6 Tex. 149 (Tex. 1851).
6 Tex. 149 (Terrel v. Townsend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buck v. Reed
363 S.W.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1962)
National Bank of Commerce v. Gilvin
152 S.W. 652 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Morris v. Booth
18 S.W. 639 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1892)
Babcock v. Milmo National Bank
1 White & W. 468 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1883)