Terrazas v. Grow Financial Federal Credit Union
205 So. 3d 881, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18493
Opinion
To the extent that Mr. Terrazas appeals from the order granting the motion to set aside the fraudulent transfer, it is dismissed as an untimely appeal. To the extent that the appeal is from the order denying his amended motion to set aside the final deficiency judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540(b), that portion of the appeal is affirmed without comment.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Terrazas v. Grow Financial Federal Credit Union, 205 So. 3d 881, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18493 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
205 So. 3d 881 (Terrazas v. Grow Financial Federal Credit Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.