Terrasure Development LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance

117 A.D.3d 559, 986 N.Y.S.2d 83

This text of 117 A.D.3d 559 (Terrasure Development LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terrasure Development LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance, 117 A.D.3d 559, 986 N.Y.S.2d 83 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered August 21, 2013, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment declaring that defendant Illinois Union Insurance Company was obligated to provide plaintiffs coverage under the Environmental Remediation Cost Containment Policy defendant issued to them, and granted defendant’s cross motion for a declaration that it was not required to provide plaintiffs coverage, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court correctly determined that plaintiffs failed to comply with numerous conditions precedent to coverage under the policy, vitiating the contract as a matter of law (see e.g. Great Canal Realty Corp. v Seneca Ins. Co., Inc., 5 NY3d 742 [2005]), including the requirement to provide timely notice of any pollution condition which might result in excess remediation costs.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Kapnick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Great Canal Realty Corp. v. Seneca Insurance
833 N.E.2d 1196 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 A.D.3d 559, 986 N.Y.S.2d 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrasure-development-llc-v-illinois-union-insurance-nyappdiv-2014.