Terrapin Pensacola LLC v. West Florida Village Inn, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Terrapin Pensacola LLC v. West Florida Village Inn, Inc.

901 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6127, 2005 WL 991629

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 29, 2005

DocketNo. 1D04-3335

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 901 So. 2d 307 (Terrapin Pensacola LLC v. West Florida Village Inn, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terrapin Pensacola LLC v. West Florida Village Inn, Inc., 901 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6127, 2005 WL 991629 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who alleged below that ap-pellees fraudulently and negligently ■ misrepresented information that would have been material to appellants’ decision to purchase a hotel from appellees, seek review of the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings rested on its conclusion that the subject sale was of only real property in the form of land, hotel and fixtures. Because the record does not support, a conclusion as a matter of law that the subject sale did not in any way involve the business stream of the hotel being purchased, judgment on the pleadings was improper on these facts. See New York State Dep’t of Taxation & Fin. v. Klein, 852 So.2d 866, 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, who alleged below that ap-pellees fraudulently and negligently ■ misrepresented information that would have been material to appellants’ decision to purchase a hotel from appellees, seek review of the trial court’s grant of appellees’ motion for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings rested on its conclusion that the subject sale was of only real property in the form of land, hotel and fixtures. Because the record does not support, a conclusion as a matter of law that the subject sale did not in any way involve the business stream of the hotel being purchased, judgment on the pleadings was improper on these facts. See New York State Dep’t of Taxation & Fin. v. Klein, 852 So.2d 866, 867 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

WOLF, C.J., DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 So. 2d 307, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6127, 2005 WL 991629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrapin-pensacola-llc-v-west-florida-village-inn-inc-fladistctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack