Terranova v. Gallagher Truck Center, Inc.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Cowley, J.), dated February 20, 1985, as denied his motion to renew a prior motion to vacate an order dismissing the complaint. The denial was without prejudice to another motion for renewal upon proper papers demonstrating a meritorious cause of action.
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Special Term properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to vacate his default absent an adequate showing that his claim has legal merit. The plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merit containing evidentiary facts, attested to by a person with personal knowledge, and his complaint and bill of partic[622] ulars, verified by his attorney, and containing conclusory assertions, was, in this case, inadequate to serve that purpose (see, Egan v Federated Dept. Stores, 108 AD2d 718). Niehoff, J. P., Rubin, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
121 A.D.2d 621 (Terranova v. Gallagher Truck Center, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.