TERRANCE SPIVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of TERRANCE SPIVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (TERRANCE SPIVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
TERRANCE SPIVEY, a/k/a TERRANCE T. SPIVEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-2479
[February 6, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Okeechobee County; Michael C. Heisey, Judge; L.T. Case No. 47-2014-CF-000477B.
Terrance Spivey, Crawfordville, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CONNER, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
TERRANCE SPIVEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrance-spivey-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.