Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.
This text of Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc. (Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-2464 ___________________________
Terrance Schrammen
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
ConAgra Foods, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota ____________
Submitted: April 2, 2019 Filed: April 5, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before ERICKSON, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Terrance Schrammen appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his pro se action asserting retaliation claims against his former employer,
1 The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David T. Schultz, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. ConAgra Foods, Inc. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Kunferman v. Ford Motor Co., 112 F.3d 962, 965 (8th Cir. 1997) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo; record is reviewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terrance Schrammen v. ConAgra Foods, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrance-schrammen-v-conagra-foods-inc-ca8-2019.