Terrance Jermaine Moore v. State
This text of Terrance Jermaine Moore v. State (Terrance Jermaine Moore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00418-CR
TERRANCE JERMAINE MOORE, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11-01511-CRF-272
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Terrance Moore was found guilty of state-jail felony theft and sentenced to
eighteen months in state jail. Moore appealed.
Moore’s appointed appellate counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and an
Anders brief, asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in
his opinion, the appeal is frivolous.1 See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,
18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Moore filed a pro se response to the Anders brief, but we find that
1 Counsel identified two potential issues but concludes that Moore could not show harm. We agree. it does not raise any potentially arguable issues.
In an Anders case, we must, “after a full examination of all the proceedings, []
decide whether the case is wholly frivolous.” Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400;
accord Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 509-11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is
“wholly frivolous” or “without merit” when it “lacks any basis in law or fact.” McCoy
v. Court of Appeals, 486 U.S. 429, 439 n.10, 108 S.Ct. 1895, 1902 n.10, 100 L.Ed.2d 440
(1988).
We have conducted an independent review of the record, and because we find
this appeal to be wholly frivolous, we affirm the judgment. Counsel must send Moore a
copy of our decision by certified mail, return receipt requested, at Moore’s last known
address. TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4. Counsel must also notify Moore of his right to file a pro se
petition for discretionary review. Id.; see also Ex parte Owens, 206 S.W.3d 670, 673-74
(Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, effective upon
counsel’s compliance with this notification requirement as evidenced by “a letter [to
this Court] certifying his compliance.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.
REX D. DAVIS Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Affirmed Opinion delivered and filed March 28, 2012 Do not publish [CR25]
Moore v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Terrance Jermaine Moore v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrance-jermaine-moore-v-state-texapp-2012.