Terrance Eugene Shaw v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 6, 2017
Docket17-2901
StatusPublished

This text of Terrance Eugene Shaw v. State of Florida (Terrance Eugene Shaw v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terrance Eugene Shaw v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

TERRANCE EUGENE SHAW, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D17-2901

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed September 7, 2017.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

Terrance Eugene Shaw, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Terrance Eugene Shaw v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrance-eugene-shaw-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2017.