Terrance Cunningham v. Bim and Associates, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 23, 2021
DocketA21D0365
StatusPublished

This text of Terrance Cunningham v. Bim and Associates, Inc. (Terrance Cunningham v. Bim and Associates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terrance Cunningham v. Bim and Associates, Inc., (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 07, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0365. TERRANCE CUNNINGHAM et al. v. BIM AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Terrance Cunningham, proceeding pro se, filed this application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal an order and judgment entered by the Fulton County Magistrate Court in a dispossessory action. We lack jurisdiction for multiple reasons. First, Cunningham’s application is untimely. An application for discretionary review generally may be filed within 30 days of entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The underlying subject matter of an appeal, however, controls over the relief sought in determining the proper appellate procedure. Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen Road Joint Venture, 311 Ga. App. 334, 335 (715 SE2d 752) (2011). Under OCGA § 44-7-56, appeals in dispossessory actions must be filed within seven days of the date the judgment was entered. See Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones, 239 Ga. App. 521, 522-523 (521 SE2d 456) (1999); see also Court of Appeals Rule 31 (a). Cunningham’s application was untimely filed on June 9, 2021, 62 days after the magistrate court order sought to be appealed was entered on April 8, 2021. Second, “[t]he only avenue of appeal available from [a] magistrate court judgment is provided by OCGA § 15-10-41 (b) (1), which allows for a de novo appeal to the state or superior court.” Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751, 751 (406 SE2d 225) (1991). This Court thus may address magistrate court matters only if they already have been reviewed by the state or superior court. See Westwind Corp. v. Washington Fed. S & L Assn., 195 Ga. App. 411, 411 (1) (393 SE2d 479) (1990). Absent an appealable state or superior court order, we are unable to entertain jurisdiction over this case, regardless of its timeliness. For each of the above reasons, Cunningham’s application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/07/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westwind Corporation v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Association
393 S.E.2d 479 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1990)
Ray M. Wright, Inc. v. Jones
521 S.E.2d 456 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Handler v. Hulsey
406 S.E.2d 225 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Radio Sandy Springs, Inc. v. Allen Road Joint Venture
715 S.E.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Terrance Cunningham v. Bim and Associates, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrance-cunningham-v-bim-and-associates-inc-gactapp-2021.