Terrace Land Development Corporation v. Seeligson & Jordan
711 N.W.2d 307, 474 Mich. 1068
This text of 711 N.W.2d 307 (Terrace Land Development Corporation v. Seeligson & Jordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Terrace Land Development Corporation v. Seeligson & Jordan, 711 N.W.2d 307, 474 Mich. 1068 (Mich. 2006).
Opinion
TERRACE LAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, C and L, Inc., and Peter Shefman, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
SEELIGSON & JORDAN, Leslie R. Seeligson, and Lawrence R. Jordan, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for adjournment or abeyance is also considered, and it is DENIED as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
DILLON-BARBER v. Regents of University of Michigan
711 N.W.2d 307 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
711 N.W.2d 307, 474 Mich. 1068, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terrace-land-development-corporation-v-seeligson-jordan-mich-2006.