Terpening v. Page

1968 OK CR 16, 437 P.2d 273, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJanuary 24, 1968
DocketNo. A-14515
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1968 OK CR 16 (Terpening v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Terpening v. Page, 1968 OK CR 16, 437 P.2d 273, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

This is an original proceedings in which the petitioner, Willard Terpening, seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this Court for his release, alleging that because he was represented by court-appointed counsel, he was denied effective counsel.

The State has filed a Demurrer, for the reason that the petition fails to state a cause of action and does not state facts sufficient to support this allegation.

After reading the petition presented to this Court, we are of the opinion that the State’s Demurrer should be sustained.

The writ prayed for is, accordingly, denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Silvey
149 Cal. App. 3d 400 (California Court of Appeal, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1968 OK CR 16, 437 P.2d 273, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terpening-v-page-oklacrimapp-1968.