Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.

258 A.D. 1070, 18 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8940

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 985.] The following questions are certified: 1. Should the motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint have been granted on the ground that plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law? 2. Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? In the event that the decision of the Court of Appeals be adverse to defendant its time to answer is extended [1071]*1071until twenty days after the determination by the Court of Appeals. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc., 258 A.D. 1070, 18 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

258 A.D. 1070 (Terner v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.