Terner Bros. v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Terner Bros. v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.

239 A.D. 804

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 804 (Terner Bros. v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Terner Bros. v. Glickstein & Terner, Inc., 239 A.D. 804 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment granted, with ten dollars costs. The amended answer, in view of the affidavits presented, is obviously a sham; and the defense that the notes were given as a loan, now interposed, is an afterthought with the object and purpose of seeking delay. It conclusively appears that the notes were given for a valuable consideration and that the plaintiff is a holder for value. No arguable defense is presented. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for summary judgment granted, with ten dollars costs. The amended answer, in view of the affidavits presented, is obviously a sham; and the defense that the notes were given as a loan, now interposed, is an afterthought with the object and purpose of seeking delay. It conclusively appears that the notes were given for a valuable consideration and that the plaintiff is a holder for value. No arguable defense is presented. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/terner-bros-v-glickstein-terner-inc-nyappdiv-1933.